<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with apa102c]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with apa102c]]></description><link>http://community.onion.io/tags/apa102c</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 09:24:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://community.onion.io/tags/apa102c.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 03:30:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[APA107LED chip, APA107 compare with APA102&#x2F;APA102C&#x2F;SK9822]]></title><description><![CDATA[@Alvin-chan
APA102/APA102C has disappeared....the SK9822 is not an exact clone of the APA102. It adds some interesting features. For example the programmable current source to control global brightness and a non-staggered update. But there are also some drawbacks like the protocol incompatibility and the lower PWM frequency...
Obviously APA107 is best choice with higher PWM and lowest price.
]]></description><link>http://community.onion.io/topic/1981/apa107led-chip-apa107-compare-with-apa102-apa102c-sk9822</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://community.onion.io/topic/1981/apa107led-chip-apa107-compare-with-apa102-apa102c-sk9822</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Gong]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 03:30:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>