<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[SPI time between transfers]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">Ive somehow managed to send commands/data to my display through the SPI port (32776.1). Ive set the clock speed to 8 MHz and this is exactly what I get on my oscilloscope. Also the display receives the information and acts accordingly.</p>
<p dir="auto">Problem: the pixel drawing on the display is extremely slow. To draw all the pixels on it, it takes ~1 minute. The time between 2 consecutive transfers seems to be fixed and ~240us. Clearly this is the problem. Does anyone have any idea about how to minimize this delay?</p>
<p dir="auto">Note: my code is written in C and the delay corresponds to consecutive instructions (one line and the following). Im using an Omega2 with the latest firmware version (0.1.10 b160).</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks beforehand for the help.<br />
Alfonso</p>
]]></description><link>http://community.onion.io/topic/2205/spi-time-between-transfers</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 22:29:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://community.onion.io/topic/2205.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:13:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SPI time between transfers on Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:54:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">Ive somehow managed to send commands/data to my display through the SPI port (32776.1). Ive set the clock speed to 8 MHz and this is exactly what I get on my oscilloscope. Also the display receives the information and acts accordingly.</p>
<p dir="auto">Problem: the pixel drawing on the display is extremely slow. To draw all the pixels on it, it takes ~1 minute. The time between 2 consecutive transfers seems to be fixed and ~240us. Clearly this is the problem. Does anyone have any idea about how to minimize this delay?</p>
<p dir="auto">Note: my code is written in C and the delay corresponds to consecutive instructions (one line and the following). Im using an Omega2 with the latest firmware version (0.1.10 b160).</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks beforehand for the help.<br />
Alfonso</p>
]]></description><link>http://community.onion.io/post/13726</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://community.onion.io/post/13726</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alfonso Blanco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:54:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>