<![CDATA[python3 startup time - ideas?]]>i've just written my 1st Omega app. When I press a button, my python3 code starts up, does some magic, and spells out today's weather forecast through a speaker.

My challenge is python's startup time - it literally takes 30 seconds for it to load the libraries I need and begin work. Do you have any tricks to make it quicker? I know I could have it run as a daemon, but while I'm working on the code I would need some tool to apply changes without restarting the daemon.

Michal

]]>http://community.onion.io/topic/767/python3-startup-time-ideasRSS for NodeTue, 17 Mar 2026 15:29:11 GMTThu, 12 May 2016 13:34:22 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to python3 startup time - ideas? on Thu, 12 May 2016 13:34:22 GMT]]>i've just written my 1st Omega app. When I press a button, my python3 code starts up, does some magic, and spells out today's weather forecast through a speaker.

My challenge is python's startup time - it literally takes 30 seconds for it to load the libraries I need and begin work. Do you have any tricks to make it quicker? I know I could have it run as a daemon, but while I'm working on the code I would need some tool to apply changes without restarting the daemon.

Michal

]]>http://community.onion.io/post/5492http://community.onion.io/post/5492Thu, 12 May 2016 13:34:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to python3 startup time - ideas? on Thu, 12 May 2016 22:16:20 GMT]]>Have you tried compiling to bytecode?

]]>http://community.onion.io/post/5497http://community.onion.io/post/5497Thu, 12 May 2016 22:16:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to python3 startup time - ideas? on Fri, 13 May 2016 13:03:13 GMT]]>Tried to compile with py_compile - didn't help.

According to "python3 -v" output, most of the time is spent reading system libraries. Take this simple file that does nothing:

import urllib.request
import urllib.parse
import json

Execution takes literally 20 seconds on my Omega.

Michal

]]>http://community.onion.io/post/5507http://community.onion.io/post/5507Fri, 13 May 2016 13:03:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to python3 startup time - ideas? on Fri, 13 May 2016 14:40:52 GMT]]>were you able to compile or something wrong happened?
If possible, would you be able to share the code using github or something else?

Vinicius

]]>http://community.onion.io/post/5513http://community.onion.io/post/5513Fri, 13 May 2016 14:40:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to python3 startup time - ideas? on Fri, 13 May 2016 14:59:57 GMT]]>I have found that python 2 is faster than 3 on the omega. Have you tried using 2? Any reason you need 3?

]]>http://community.onion.io/post/5515http://community.onion.io/post/5515Fri, 13 May 2016 14:59:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to python3 startup time - ideas? on Sat, 14 May 2016 06:45:09 GMT]]>@Vinicius-Batista i was able to compile my code, but it wasn't any faster on startup

]]>http://community.onion.io/post/5532http://community.onion.io/post/5532Sat, 14 May 2016 06:45:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to python3 startup time - ideas? on Sat, 14 May 2016 06:52:30 GMT]]>@Samuel-Mathieson no real reason to use py3 - I was learning Python so I thought I should start with the most recent version.

The time it takes to start bare shell in python2/3 is in my case:

  • 4 seconds for Python 2.7
  • 5.5 seconds for Python 3.4

But importing urllib.request increases the python3 startup time to 22 secs. For python2, importing urllib does not have that much impact (4->5.5).

Michal

]]>http://community.onion.io/post/5533http://community.onion.io/post/5533Sat, 14 May 2016 06:52:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to python3 startup time - ideas? on Sat, 14 May 2016 14:56:46 GMT]]>Hi @Michal-Rok .
Python is an interpreted language, so this is usually slow during initialisation. I just created a small script that reads response from a rest service(http get) and print it on the oled expansion. It takes about 4 seconds to initialise. I believe that it's partially due to omega's hardware limitations.

So, if initialisation time is something crucial for your project, I would suggest look for some alternatives - namely C and C++.

Regards,
Vinicius

]]>http://community.onion.io/post/5538http://community.onion.io/post/5538Sat, 14 May 2016 14:56:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to python3 startup time - ideas? on Sun, 15 May 2016 01:31:33 GMT]]>Like Vinicius said, if you have no real reason to use something like C and can get away with python, if it is not crucial to have a fast initialization time, I would go with Python. Also, the difference between python 2 and 3 is minimal. Really 3 is just making things a little more consistent. Mostly if you change your print "ok" to print("ok") that should do it. I would go with python 2.

One suggestion. I have found that it is faster to use os.system() for some things rather than their python equivalents. Perhaps you could look into that?

Regards,
Sam.

]]>http://community.onion.io/post/5549http://community.onion.io/post/5549Sun, 15 May 2016 01:31:33 GMT