Topics created by luz

that is a beautiful piece of furniture. but, i'm kind surprised that google has not informed you to rename it. they can be jerks.

Hi @Jackdaw! Can you please tell how did you imported the mt76x8 driver? I'm trying to build it with original source from LEDE but get stuck with some dependencies.

Crickets and tumbleweed

@Marti-MG Thanks for this information!

I made a separate mode for the WS2811 because the timing specs from the datasheet I had were definitely not compatible with those I knew working with the WS2812/13. But I had no WS2811 to test back then.

I'm not too surprised that apparently the datasheet is not correct. I saw the same for WS2813 which had the T0L time specified 300nS, which is definitely not working with real WS2813 as I found out.

The modes are actually just timing numbers in a table in the driver, see line 157 in p44-ledchain.c. So it would be simple to nudge the WS2811 entry towards the WS2813 timing until it works.

For the time being, I just added a note to the p44-ledchain README.md to also try WS2813 mode in case WS2811 does not work.

@Siddharth-Velappan Unfortunately, it is not possible to switch on phy1..4 individually. Only phy0 can be switched independently; the other 4 always are all in phy or all in GPIO mode.

The AGPIO_CFG register layout suggests that there is a separate disable bit for each phy, but that's not the case. See the note in the MT7688 datasheet on page 59 reading "When any bit of bit[20:17] is set to 1, P1 ~ P4 will be swiched to digital PADs together."

It seems to me that this is one of the small oversights in the MT7688 that probably happened when MediaTek had to "IoT-ze" a former router chip design (too) quickly. Other examples of this are the SPI not working correctly in full duplex mode and the PWM units that are not connected to DMA...

Thanks mate! You just saved me a lot of debugging time

@fossette said in Any omega hackers at 33C3?:

PS: 6809 is a nice number. My preference is 6502...
I guess it depends on personal experience back in the old days :-) I never had a 6502 based machine, but built a few 6809 ones

@Iker this time the malaware just was a popup ... now i got it.

At least, you guys are using smilies. :tools: It's an excellent start! :grinning:

@Alexander-Pitzer A docker image would be most convenient! But that's something the community could do, once the .config is known (plus maybe some stuff for /files).

Figuring out the right .config by reverse engineering however would be really tedious and completely redundant work, because that .config already does exist - only it's not available! So I still hope Onion will decide to publish it! Any chances for that, @Lazar-Demin?