What ethernet speed can be achieved with Omega2 LTE and Ethernet extension board?



  • Hi,

    I have Omega2 LTE board (Omega2S+ on it) and ethernet extension board but I have problem with data rate.
    I can not achieve more than 16.8Mbps so I am wondering if it is something that can be resolved in software or there is a hardware limitation?
    Did anyone manage to achieve higher data rate? I need at least 40-50Mbps for my application.

    Thanks!



  • @grbaxtz How are you testing?



  • @crispyoz

    First, we made WiFi to ETH demo so we can connect PC with ETH port to WiFi and speed test showed 16.8Mbps (2.1MB/s).
    Then, we tried scp big_file root@192.168.100.1:/dev/null to eliminate WiFi as bottleneck and we got the same numbers.



  • @grbaxtz what does iperf report?



  • Just for reference, testing my Omega2S based boards with ethernet and iperf3 against a iperf3 server in the local network gives me ~95Mbit:

    # iperf3 -c 192.168.11.1
    Connecting to host 192.168.11.1, port 5201
    [  5] local 192.168.11.175 port 45730 connected to 192.168.11.1 port 5201
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
    [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  11.5 MBytes  96.3 Mbits/sec    0   84.8 KBytes       
    [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  11.1 MBytes  93.6 Mbits/sec    0   84.8 KBytes       
    [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  11.3 MBytes  94.6 Mbits/sec    0   84.8 KBytes       
    [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  11.2 MBytes  94.0 Mbits/sec    0   84.8 KBytes       
    [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  11.2 MBytes  93.7 Mbits/sec    0   84.8 KBytes       
    [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  11.2 MBytes  94.1 Mbits/sec    0   84.8 KBytes       
    [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  11.1 MBytes  93.4 Mbits/sec    0   84.8 KBytes       
    [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  11.2 MBytes  93.7 Mbits/sec    0   84.8 KBytes       
    [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  11.2 MBytes  94.0 Mbits/sec    0   84.8 KBytes       
    [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  11.2 MBytes  93.9 Mbits/sec    0   84.8 KBytes       
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
    [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   112 MBytes  94.1 Mbits/sec    0             sender
    [  5]   0.00-10.01  sec   112 MBytes  94.0 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    
    iperf Done.
    

    To compare, WiFi (using the mt76 standard driver, not firecore):

    iperf3 -c 192.168.11.1
    Connecting to host 192.168.11.1, port 5201
    [  5] local 192.168.11.149 port 33752 connected to 192.168.11.1 port 5201
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
    [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  5.87 MBytes  49.3 Mbits/sec    0    198 KBytes       
    [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  6.13 MBytes  51.4 Mbits/sec    0    238 KBytes       
    [  5]   2.00-3.01   sec  6.41 MBytes  53.5 Mbits/sec    0    238 KBytes       
    [  5]   3.01-4.00   sec  5.58 MBytes  47.1 Mbits/sec    0    238 KBytes       
    [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  6.05 MBytes  50.8 Mbits/sec    0    238 KBytes       
    [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  6.01 MBytes  50.5 Mbits/sec    0    238 KBytes       
    [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  6.17 MBytes  51.7 Mbits/sec    0    238 KBytes       
    [  5]   7.00-8.01   sec  6.20 MBytes  51.7 Mbits/sec    0    238 KBytes       
    [  5]   8.01-9.00   sec  6.03 MBytes  50.9 Mbits/sec    0    238 KBytes       
    [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  5.88 MBytes  49.3 Mbits/sec    0    238 KBytes       
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
    [  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  60.3 MBytes  50.6 Mbits/sec    0             sender
    [  5]   0.00-10.04  sec  60.2 MBytes  50.3 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    
    iperf Done.
    

    The OS here is OpenWrt 22.03.2, but at least the ethernet speed should not be any different in older versions. mt76 on the other hand is probably a lot better now than it was in 19.xx.



  • @luz my testing on OpenWrt 21 some time ago gave similar results, 90ish Mb/s depending on what services are running on the Omega2 at the time. My comments were an attempt to encourage the author to undertake a recognised testing methodology and report the results šŸ˜€


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to Community was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.