CAN Bus: using MCP2515 with Omega2
-
@DumTux said in CAN Bus: using MCP2515 with Omega2:
Fabulous!
After a few seconds of power on, GPIO11 went to HIGH status and never dropped to LOW level while MCP2515 operating. Instead, after CAN bus enabling, the GPIO11 voltage was ~2.0V.
I think it was because MCP2515 was trying to pull down, while Omega2 is trying to output HIGH.But with that GPIO number fixing, it dropped to LOW after CAN bus enabling.
Here's the results.root@OpenWrt:~# ls /sys/class/gpio/ export gpiochip416 gpiochip448 gpiochip480 unexport root@OpenWrt:~# echo 491 > /sys/class/gpio/export root@OpenWrt:~# ls /sys/class/gpio/ export gpio491 gpiochip416 gpiochip448 gpiochip480 unexport root@OpenWrt:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio491/direction out root@OpenWrt:~# echo in > /sys/class/gpio/gpio491/direction root@OpenWrt:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio491/direction in root@OpenWrt:~# insmod /lib/modules/5.10.146/mcp251x.ko root@OpenWrt:~# ip l | grep can 6: can0: <NOARP,ECHOmtu 16 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 10 link/can root@OpenWrt:~# ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 125000 root@OpenWrt:~#
Just after this
ip link set can0 up
command ran, the GPIO11 dropped to LOW.
I think MCP2515 is pulling down the INT# pin as it is constantly receiving packets from external sensor.I'll keep my further working results posted.
-
@luz @Lazar-Demin @crispyoz and all!
I am still having trouble with CAN bus driving.Current behavior
- I set GPIO11 as input and load the MCP251x kernel module as per above discussion.
- Now enable
can0
and send packets using these commands.
root@OpenWrt:~# ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 125000 root@OpenWrt:~# cansend can0 01a#11223344AABBCCDD
- I can see the waveform on bus by oscilloscope correctly.
- Restart the bus as loopback mode to test somthing different.
root@OpenWrt:~# ip link set can0 down root@OpenWrt:~# ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 125000 loopback on
- Now the INT# (GPIO11) falls to LOW. MCP2515 stopped working.
*** MCP2515 does not recover even though I disable/enable the bus again like this.
root@OpenWrt:~# ip link set can0 down root@OpenWrt:~# ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 125000
- I have to turn off the board power and turn it on again to make MCP2515 INT# recovered.
dmesg
shows nothing except success logs like this during all these operation.
... [ 68.586340] mcp251x spi0.1 can0: MCP2515 successfully initialized. [ 69.759118] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): can0: link becomes ready [ 124.360819] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): can0: link becomes ready ...
- The same situation goes for when I connect external sensor module, that emits CAN message periodically.
- As soon as any external packet is coming in, the MCP2515 INT# falls to LOW. I can read nothing via
candump
. - All this behavior were the same no matter of setting GPIO11 as IN or not before loading the MCP251x kernel module.
Questions
- Is this still IRQ problem?
- Is there any way to check MCP2515 resistor values using
canutils
package commands? - Is there other reading method except
candump
? For example, instead of inturrupt-basedcandump
, manual polling.
-
I am going to try to modify the bootloader to not handle GPIO11 for the dock power supply.
There is a bootloader on OnionIoT GitHub account, but it seems like outdated.
And I could not find the current OpenWrt 22.03 build using it.Thus, I guess GPIO11 handling is somewhere patched inside OpenWrt 22.03's specific config files.
I could see some MediaTek related config patches underopenwrt/package/boot/uboot-mediatek/
.
There I either cannot find specific configs related to Omega2.
As MT76x8 is used in router products a lot, I don't believe the Omega2 specific config will be under this location.Where can I find the OpenWrt 22.03 bootloader for Omega2?
-
@DumTux The bootloader is independent of the firmware. If you've reflashed your Omega2, it will still be running the factory bootloader.
The factory bootloader is compiled from this source code: https://github.com/OnionIoT/omega2-bootloader/
GPIO11 is set high to be compatible with the reset button on the Omega2 Docks. You can find that here in the bootloader: https://github.com/OnionIoT/omega2-bootloader/blob/master/lib_mips/board.c#L3028When you've compiled your own bootloader, follow these instructions to update your device: http://docs.onion.io/omega2-docs/Web-Recovery-flash-bootloader.html
-
void gpio_init(void) { .... RALINK_REG(RT2880_REG_PIODIR+0x04)=val; /* //zh@onion.io //setting GPIO 11 High, required for the reset button to work val=RALINK_REG(RT2880_REG_PIODIR); val|=1<<11; RALINK_REG(RT2880_REG_PIODIR) = val; // GPIO 11 direction output val=RALINK_REG(RT2880_REG_PIODATA); val|=1<<11; RALINK_REG(RT2880_REG_PIODATA) = val; // GPIO 11 High */ //jeffzhou@onion.io //adding for read wifi MAC address. unsigned char macbuf[6]; raspi_read(macbuf, CFG_FACTORY_ADDR - CFG_FLASH_BASE + 0x04, 6); printf("wifi mac address = %02X%02X%02X%02X%02X%02X.\n", macbuf[0],macbuf[1],macbuf[2],macbuf[3],macbuf[4],macbuf[5]); }
I commented the GPIO11 related part in the bootloader source code, and built it.
Just usedmake
command.After entering to Web recovery mode on Omega2's boot, I went to uBoot upgrade page.
There was Very dangerous warning, but I proceeded.
And after done, that dangerous result happened - not booting.Is there some
make
option to build a bootloader specfic for Omega2+ ?
-
As a comparison, this is normal booting screenshot from the factory bootloader.
It is showing DRAM size 128MB, while my above wrong bootloader shows as 64MB.
Also, flash memory is wrongly recognized.
-
@DumTux Make sure to run
setup_env.sh
and then you can usebuild.sh
to build the bootloader binaries.
-
@Lazar-Demin
How can I build a U-Boot image for Omega2+ ?
-
@DumTux The process is:
git clone https://github.com/OnionIoT/omega2-bootloader/
cd omega2-bootloader
./setup_env.sh
chmod +x build.sh
./build.shThis produces 2 files:
uboot-omega2-<date>.bin
uboot-omega2p-<date>.binThe latter is the Omega2+ uboot
-
@crispyoz @Lazar-Demin
Yes, it worked. I choose theomgega2-bootloader
instead ofomega2p-bootloader
accidentally.
After soldering with a brand new Omeba2S+ module, I carefully upgraded bootloader.Here's the pre-compiled bootloader for others' future reference.
https://github.com/dumtux/omega2-bootloader/releases/tag/tower-bootloader-v0.1After disabling GPIO11 default behavior from Omega2's bootloader, I could see some different behavior of MCP2515 kernel driver.
I could see some short impulses while initializing MCP2515 driver and enablingcan0
interface.
I didn't see such impulses before with the default bootloader.I'll keep posting further results.
-
@DumTux
AFAIK the main problem is related to the wrong GPIO/IRQ mapping:
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/can-mcp2515-gpio-irq-problem/92879/3Maybe luz or Lazar could give a hint ?
-
@Gerhard-Bertelsmann Yes, the 19.07 version of
gpio-mt7621.c
interrupt routing implementation is broken for GPIO interrupts assigned via DT.I made ugly patches to fix that back then, I can dig them out if someone wants to use them, but I can't exactly recommend (it was kind of an emergency hack for an urgent project).
As far as I know, the issue should be fixed in the 22.03 version of
gpio-mt7621.c
, as the entire driver has been reworked to align with other modern GPIO drivers and handles the banks differently.But I haven't had the chance to test it so far, and the link to the OpenWrt forum you posted saying it is not yet fixed in 21.02 makes me doubt a bit, because I thought the rework already happened in the 21.02 time frame, but I can't verify or test that right now.
-
@Gerhard-Bertelsmann
I experienced similar error messages when I used the wrong GPIO number.
For example, I tried this.
interrupts = <75 0x02>
And it gave very similar error as yours on kernel module loading.As far as I used the right GPIO number 11, the kernel module loading was just successful.
I don't have a clue if this means the issue was eliminated in 22.03.When I connect two boards via CAN bus, I could only enable CAN driver from one board.
Currently, I am in a different situation after disabling GPIO11's default behavior of the bootloader.
I can enable both side drivers. And each board can send CAN packets bycansend
.
However, the interrupt is not invoking andcandump
still prints nothing.
-
@luz said in CAN Bus: using MCP2515 with Omega2:
I made ugly patches to fix that back then, I can dig them out if someone wants to use them, but I can't exactly recommend (it was kind of an emergency hack for an urgent project).
I would be interested in this patch
As far as I know, the issue should be fixed in the 22.03 version of
gpio-mt7621.c
, as the entire driver has been reworked to align with other modern GPIO drivers and handles the banks differently.I switched to 22.03 but the problem is still present
-
I just did another experiment.
I disconnected external sensor.Omega2 -> MCP2515 -> (open) -> Oscilloscope
If I enable the CAN bus like this, I can see output CAN packet from the oscilloscope.
ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 125000 cansend can0 01a#112233
Next, I enabled CAN bus with loopback mode.
ip link set can0 down ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 125000 loopback on cansend can0 01a#112233
No CAN packet waveform I can see!
To see it again, I should re-enable the CAN bus without loopback mode.ip link set can0 down ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 125000 loopback off cansend can0 01a#112233
Any thought from this loopback mode behavior?
-
@luz
I also would like to see your patches as @Gerhard-Bertelsmann said.
Is it somewhere in public repo?
-
@DumTux said in CAN Bus: using MCP2515 with Omega2:
Next, I enabled CAN bus with loopback mode.
ip link set can0 down ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 125000 loopback on cansend can0 01a#112233
No CAN packet waveform I can see!
that's the usual behaviour in loopback mode. Packets are not transmitted to the transceiver.
I use the loopback mode for testing purpose. If this works (received the same data as send) everything is fine with the communication to the CAN controller.
-
@Gerhard-Bertelsmann said in CAN Bus: using MCP2515 with Omega2:
I switched to 22.03 but the problem is still present
Ok, interesting! So the rework did not catch that. Maybe I mixed it up in hindsight with the initialisation of GPIO output's initial value (did not work as expected in 19.07, I had to patch that too back then, but definitely this now works in 22.03 as is)
I would be interested in this patch
Note that this is a patch on top of a pristine openwrt v19.07.8 tree, which consists of adding kernel patches, which then are applied in the process of building the kernel. So the patch is kind of a "meta-patch", doing the following:
- (up to line 607) updates the
gpio-mt7621.c
to a newer version from upstream. I had forgotten about that - it seems this newer version is quite near to today's 22.03 version. - (lines 649..717) patches that new driver to fix the IRQ problem. This patch is ugly because it needs to swap the private
irq_ops
with a modified copy to implement theselect
callback. - (lines 608..648) patches
OMEGA2.dtsi
and (lines 718..) adds a new version formt7628an.dtsi
calledmt7688newgpio.dtsi
because the new driver now addresses the gpios by number, no longer by bank+offset.
I package such changes into openwrt tree (meta)patches rather than forking the openwrt tree, because different projects need different patches, and I don't want a multitude of trees or branches, and keep the changes versioned per project in my own feeds, not openwrt.
The p44build script helps with that workflow in case you are interested.
- (up to line 607) updates the
-
@luz
I triedp44b
build script first of all.
And I got this result.It seems like the build script doesn't support OpenWrt 22.03 yet.
It totally make sense, as many file locations and contents are updated to kernel 5.10, it would mess if I force to apply all patches globally.
I am now on the way to manually applying the GPIO patch to OpenWrt 22.03.
But it's not easy for me as thegpio-mt7621.c
seems like changed.
-
@DumTux the
p44b
script works from the information in thep44build
directory you specify at init. It seems you tried with an older project that was still on 18.06.4.p44b
works with 22.03 but I don't have a complete setup yet exactly because of the various detail issues I am still having.But it's not easy for me as the gpio-mt7621.c seems like changed.
I agree , it takes an awful lot of time to dig into such things and get it right.
But by now, gpio-mt7621.c seems to be Linux mainline
Looking at the commit history of that file in Linux mainline, it seems that there were several changes related to IRQ handling in the past 2 years.
Maybe it would make more sense to try to use that latest mainline version and see if the changed IRQ handling now works correctly. Hoping this seems not too unrealistic to me - all the changes mostly seem to be generalisations, i.e. replacing mt7621 specific things by generic mechanisms that work for many other drivers, too.